I'm with Martin on this. I was a bit surprised to see us jump to a synchronous 4-hour meeting on this topic.
I'm not sure what outcome the chairs want out of the meeting, so I'd also be keen to see an agenda or at least an idea of what the goals of this meeting are. On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 8:29 AM Florin Baboescu <florin.baboescu= [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Lars, > I believe that splitting the original time slot for the meeting into two > or three 2h slots could be handled easier at least for the ones on the > West Coast of US. Also based on previous meetings experience we found out > that 5:00- 8:00am PST (20:00 - 23:00 Beijing, 17:30 - 20:30 Delhi, 14:00 > - 17:00 Munich) is typically a good slot for people across most of the > time zones. > Thank you. > -Florin > > > -----Original Message----- > From: QUIC [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lars Eggert > Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 11:03 PM > To: Martin Thomson <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Scheduling a WG Interim on multipath > > On 2020-10-7, at 1:57, Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote: > > A four hour meeting is not going to help. I was forced to choose > between staying up to 2am or waking at 4am. Neither of which I can do. > > Sorry - clearly my timezone math was wrong. I wonder if we should try and > schedule two or three 2h slots instead? > > Lars >
