On Fri, 16 Oct 2020, 09:45 Mirja Kuehlewind, <mirja.kuehlewind= [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi David, > > > > I was sending this request to exactly understand if or what the issues > are/could be in not having the DATA frame. Can you maybe further explain > which issue you see? > I can't speak for David but the issues I forsee come from additional code paths needed to support the feature. The frame parsing code needs to become HTTP method-aware, which is not the case in the implementation I own. With QUIC chair hat on: this is very late to be proposing design changes. It might even be too late. I'm setting a high bar here for compelling evidence or support that something needs to be changed. Cheers Lucas masque <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque> > >
