On Fri, Oct 30, 2020, at 10:42, Christian Huitema wrote: > That means doing thing differently for a regular migration and for a NAT > rebinding. A regular migration happens starts the client sends a full > size packet, with a not yet seen CID, and containing a path challenge. > Responding to that with a full size response makes sense. But if the > server receives a short packet, with an already used CID, and without a > path challenge, that's probably a NAT rebinding. Responding with full > size challenge packets is counter-productive.
Ahh, that seems sensible. Conveniently, the current PR results in what you describe, so I have less work to do :)
