Hi Igor, Mauro, All, Thank you for pointing this out. Let me also highlight the great work we did to merge the two previous drafts (draft-ferrieuxhamchaoui-tsvwg-lossbits and draft-cfb-ippm-spinbit-measurements) with a lot of email discussion within the design team.
Regards, Giuseppe -----Original Message----- From: ippm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lubashev, Igor Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 8:18 AM To: Bulgarella Fabio (Guest) <[email protected]>; IETF IPPM WG <[email protected]> Cc: Marcus Ihlar <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; Jari Arkko <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [ippm] New Version Notification for draft-mdt-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements-00.txt Thanks for presenting this draft today, Mauro. This work has been presented and well-received in multiple working groups (quic, tsvwg, mops, maprg) as well as ippm during multiple previous IETF meetings. The present draft is a result of much feedback we received there. Since the draft is ultimately about measurement techniques -- ippm's domain -- we've called for its adoption today. Best, - Igor -----Original Message----- From: Bulgarella Fabio (Guest) <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2020 5:45 AM To: IETF IPPM WG <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; Marcus Ihlar <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; Jari Arkko <[email protected]> Subject: I: New Version Notification for draft-mdt-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements-00.txt Dear IPPM WG, following up the discussion on the mailing list and in the previous meeting (IETF 108), we merged the previous two drafts on explicit measures (draft-ferrieuxhamchaoui-tsvwg-lossbits, draft-cfb-ippm-spinbit-measurements) in the enclosed new document. The authors of the previous drafts and other contributors jointly worked on this new revision in order to merge the content of the two drafts making a unified explanation. A recap section has been added to give an immediate overview of the available methodologies, for both delay and loss metrics, by using comparing tables. If you want, you could also have a look at this new related IPPM draft https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cnbf-ippm-user-devices-explicit-monitoring-00.txt__;!!GjvTz_vk!Dw_7Wq42NUtivV0I3sp_4lfabGH0G7qV7b-nmTVfu0Eg9qZyh7DL48pASuIRm3s$ Comments and suggestions are more than welcome. Best Regards, Fabio B. ________________________________________ Da: [email protected] <[email protected]> Inviato: lunedì 2 novembre 2020 16:30 A: Riccardo Sisto; Giuseppe Fioccola; Bulgarella Fabio (Guest); Alexandre Ferrieux; Isabelle Hamchaoui; Igor Lubashev; Cociglio Mauro; Dmitri Tikhonov; Nilo Massimo Oggetto: [EXT] New Version Notification for draft-mdt-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements-00.txt A new version of I-D, draft-mdt-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Igor Lubashev and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-mdt-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements Revision: 00 Title: Explicit Flow Measurements Techniques Document date: 2020-11-02 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 38 URL: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mdt-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements-00.txt__;!!GjvTz_vk!Dw_7Wq42NUtivV0I3sp_4lfabGH0G7qV7b-nmTVfu0Eg9qZyh7DL48pAUsWRr6Q$ Status: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mdt-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements/__;!!GjvTz_vk!Dw_7Wq42NUtivV0I3sp_4lfabGH0G7qV7b-nmTVfu0Eg9qZyh7DL48pA-3p1zrE$ Html: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mdt-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements-00.html__;!!GjvTz_vk!Dw_7Wq42NUtivV0I3sp_4lfabGH0G7qV7b-nmTVfu0Eg9qZyh7DL48pAi9tD2Xc$ Htmlized: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mdt-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements-00__;!!GjvTz_vk!Dw_7Wq42NUtivV0I3sp_4lfabGH0G7qV7b-nmTVfu0Eg9qZyh7DL48pAR5iZens$ Abstract: This document describes protocol independent methods called Explicit Flow Measurement Techniques that employ few marking bits, inside the header of each packet, for loss and delay measurement. The endpoints, marking the traffic, signal these metrics to intermediate observers allowing them to measure connection performance, and to locate the network segment where impairments happen. Different alternatives are considered within this document. These signaling methods apply to all protocols but they are especially valuable when applied to protocols that encrypt transport header and do not allow traditional methods for delay and loss detection. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat _______________________________________________ ippm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
