I was just reviewing the applicability draft (Brian, Mirja, expect a PR soon). I was surprised to see such a strong assertion regarding idempotence in there. I followed the link to the TLS draft and found that the text there was just wrong. Not badly wrong, but wrong in a way that conflicts with RFC 8470.
Now, I wrote both, so there is no excuse. But I'd like to be given a chance to fix this. Issue: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4393 Pull Request: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4394 This is a substantive change that better aligns the rules here with existing work. Cheers, Martin
