I attempt to solve these problems with my own fork of datagram. I think
you are talking about possible data loss do to anomalies. Take a look:
https://www.github.com/kjsisco/datagram
Kevin
http://kclive.buzzsprout.com
On 11/27/2020 3:23 AM, Timo Völker wrote:
Hi all,
Section 7.6. starts the explanation of Persistent Congestion with
When a sender establishes loss of all in-flight packets...
Does this mean that packets that do not count as in-flight (e.g. a packet that
contains only an ACK frame) are ignored here?
To refer to the example in section 7.6.3. What if at t=4.5 a packet were send
with only an ACK frame, which gets acknowledged along with the last sent
ack-eliciting packet with the ack received at t=12.2? Would this be still a
persistent congestion or not?
Timo
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
