As this wasn't mentioned in the discussion: On Wed, Nov 25, 2020, at 14:34, Jana Iyengar wrote: > First though, a point on terminology: the receiver maintains a separate > "ReceivedPackets" for each CID, probably for each CID sequence number > (CSN). Let's please not call this a SACK Dashboard, to avoid confusion. > > On the question of sending more than 2^32 packets, I think that > resetting the packet number (PN) is ok on new CIDs.
A design like this would require changes to the way that keys are generated. Unfortunately, I think that this also increases the cost of key generation a little for reasons specific to the internal workings of the key derivation function.
