Events without label "editorial"

Issues
------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+2/-9/💬41)
 2 issues created:
 - Clarify header protection sampling  (by larseggert)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4435 [-tls] [ietf-lc] - Pakcet loss problem in Quic (by LyraWang) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4433
 11 issues received 41 new comments:
 - #4435 Clarify header protection sampling  (7 by PaulDance, janaiyengar, 
kazuho, larseggert)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4435 [-tls] [ietf-lc] - #4433 Pakcet loss problem in Quic (7 by LyraWang, larseggert) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4433 - #4393 Idempotency and replay (1 by martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4393 [-tls] [design] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] - #4380 IANA review of -transport; overall correctness (5 by gloinul, larseggert, martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4380 [-transport] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] - #4379 IANA review of -transport; question 4 (1 by janaiyengar) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4379 [-transport] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] - #4378 IANA review of -transport; question 3 (1 by larseggert) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4378 [-transport] [design] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] - #4376 IANA review of -transport; question 1 (3 by LPardue, gloinul) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4376 [-transport] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] - #4369 IANA review of -tls (4 by DavidSchinazi, martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4369 [-tls] [design] [ietf-lc] - #4336 Error code for illegal field composition (1 by LPardue) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4336 [-http] [design] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] - #4280 No IANA version registry (2 by LPardue, gloinul) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4280 [-transport] [design] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] - #4257 Path Challenge Padding and Amplification Protection (9 by DavidSchinazi, MikeBishop, huitema, ianswett, janaiyengar, kazuho, larseggert, martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4257 [-transport] [call-issued] [design] [ietf-lc]
 9 issues closed:
- IANA review of -transport; overall correctness https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4380 [-transport] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] - Clarify header protection sampling https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4435 [-tls] [ietf-lc] - Pakcet loss problem in Quic https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4433 - IANA review of -transport; question 1 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4376 [-transport] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] - Path Challenge Padding and Amplification Protection https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4257 [-transport] [design] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] - Idempotency and replay https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4393 [-tls] [design] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] - No IANA version registry https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4280 [-transport] [design] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] - Reserve fewer codepoints for greasing https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4387 [-http] [-transport] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] - IANA review of -transport; question 4 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4379 [-transport] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready]
* quicwg/ops-drafts (+12/-5/💬17)
 12 issues created:
 - In prose, it is "connection ID" (by martinthomson)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/152 - Connection ID linkability is missing a premise (by martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/151 - Delete QoS and ECMP (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/149 - Should DDoS section talk about Retry Services? (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/148 - DDoS guidance is inaccurate about QUIC-LB (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/147 - Add Considerations for NAT (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/146 - Ask people not to drop new versions? (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/145 - Does the length self-encoding scheme actually work? (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/144 - Do clients really use zero-length CIDs? (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/143 - Integrity Protection is not quite right (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/142 - Double check security considerations sections (by britram) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/141 [-applicability] [-manageability] [final check] - Rewrite QoS and ECMP section to actually talk about DSCP (by britram) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/140
 9 issues received 17 new comments:
 - #149 Delete QoS and ECMP (2 by martinduke, mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/149 - #148 Should DDoS section talk about Retry Services? (3 by martinduke, mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/148 - #147 DDoS guidance is inaccurate about QUIC-LB (1 by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/147 - #146 Add Considerations for NAT (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/146 - #145 Ask people not to drop new versions? (2 by martinthomson, mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/145 - #143 Do clients really use zero-length CIDs? (4 by ianswett, martinduke, martinthomson, nibanks) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/143 - #142 Integrity Protection is not quite right (2 by martinduke, mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/142 - #139 Normative language in applicability statement (1 by britram) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/139 - #131 QoS support and ECMP section (1 by britram) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/131
 5 issues closed:
- Delete QoS and ECMP https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/149 - Do clients really use zero-length CIDs? https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/143 - QoS support and ECMP section https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/131 - Normative language in applicability statement https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/139 - Double check use of normative language https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/85 [-applicability] [-manageability] [final check]
* quicwg/load-balancers (+2/-4/💬4)
 2 issues created:
 - PCID without SID configuration? (by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/64 - Add Acknowledgments (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/62
 4 issues received 4 new comments:
 - #62 Add Acknowledgments (1 by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/62 - #16 Giving the client more information (1 by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/16 [needs-discussion] - #12 Configuration ID might be too small (1 by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/12 [needs-discussion] - #8 Unguessable connection IDs (1 by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/8 [needs-discussion]
 4 issues closed:
- Add Acknowledgments https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/62 - Configuration ID might be too small https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/12 [needs-discussion] - Unguessable connection IDs https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/8 [needs-discussion] - Giving the client more information https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/16 [needs-discussion]


Pull requests
-------------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+3/-5/💬8)
 3 pull requests submitted:
 - Define pseudo-code of header protection using packet number offset (by 
kazuho)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4436 - Add 'time' to latest_in_flight_lost (by ianswett) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4434 - Final salt and retry keys (by martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4431 [-tls] [design]
 2 pull requests received 8 new comments:
 - #4434 Add 'time' to latest_in_flight_lost (7 by ianswett, janaiyengar, 
larseggert, martinthomson)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4434 - #4431 Final salt and retry keys (1 by ghedo) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4431 [-tls] [design]
 5 pull requests merged:
 - Apply the 3x amplification-limit to migration too
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4264 [-transport] [design] - Idempotent is not the standard for 0-RTT https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4394 [-tls] [design] - Add Versions registry https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4345 [-transport] [design] - Don't DoS the IANA registry server https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4428 [-http] [-transport] - handling of KeyUpdate in other epochs are specified in RFC 8446, do not override https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4412
* quicwg/ops-drafts (+2/-2/💬2)
 2 pull requests submitted:
 - More applicability edits (by martinthomson)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/153 - Editorial Pass on quic-manageability (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/150
 2 pull requests received 2 new comments:
 - #150 Editorial Pass on quic-manageability (1 by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/150 - #134 Remove QOS support and ECMP (1 by britram) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/134
 2 pull requests merged:
 - Remove normative language from the drafts
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/132 - Edits, first batch https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/135
* quicwg/load-balancers (+1/-0/💬10)
 1 pull requests submitted:
 - Paragraph on SNI routing (by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/63
 4 pull requests received 10 new comments:
 - #61 Add ECMP CID algorithm (2 by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/61 - #59 Aead retry token (6 by huitema, martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/59 - #58 Added transport parameter (1 by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/58 - #37 One more config rotation bit. (1 by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/37

Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/datagram
* https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers
* https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation

Reply via email to