Thanks for this draft! I like the way it's going. I'm not sure I like the repurposing of RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID to close a path. There are other valid reasons to retire a path -- for instance, the sequence number is low relative to the other active ones, and the intermediate numbers are requiring extra state. RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID is useful to force the peer to use a new CID for the path.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 8:29 AM Lucas Pardue <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 Dec 2020, 09:10 Martin Thomson, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks for being so responsive on this. It is a small thing we requested >> that you could have deferred until a larger update, but I appreciate the >> update. >> > > +1, thanks > > >
