Hi Martin, Thanks for the comments. I've captured each comment as a new issue on the QUIC WG base-drafts Github repository and tagged you in each one. The document editors will follow up on each issue and may create Pull Requests if needs be. See in-line response for more details. We'll be tracking all IESG comments on the Transport document under https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/milestone/25
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 8:43 PM Martin Duke via Datatracker < [email protected]> wrote: > Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-quic-recovery-33: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-recovery/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Great document! > > It’s odd that sec 4.7 doesn’t mention RACK at all, as that’s headed to TCP > standard. > https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4467 Cheers, Lucas On behalf of QUC WG Chairs
