Thanks for this Martin. I've added the off-path thing to the pile of changes in -transport and -tls. See https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4462
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020, at 17:35, Martin Duke via Datatracker wrote: > Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-quic-invariants-12: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-invariants/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Due to the discussion in quic-transport, some of the description of the VN > packet here may turn out to be misleading (as “supported versions” fields may > be used for other things). We should reevaluate once that is resolved. > > Again, the use of “off-path attacker” in sec 7 is inconsistent with the other > documents. > > > >
