Thanks Lucas! Separate emails to boost the visibility of all design changes will be most appreciated!
David On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 4:32 PM Lucas Pardue <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > As some of you may have noticed, ahead of the IESG telechat on January > 7th, our friends in the IESG are steadily entering their ballot positions > on the transport, recovery, tls, and invariants drafts. > > The chairs have created issues in the QUIC WG GitHub repository to help > track follow on discussion and proposed actions. We use the label "iesg" > (and the appropriate document label): > https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/labels/iesg > > Issues are also tracked in per-document milestones: > > - transport: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/milestone/23 > - tls: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/milestone/24 > - recovery: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/milestone/25 > - invariants: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/milestone/26 > > > As you can see, there's a large volume of comments that have come in a > short amount of time. Naming things is an art, attempting to synthesize > concise titles on behalf of IESG reviewers risks us adding subjectivity to > the review and/or losing something in translation (not to mention it is > more time consuming). So to avoid that, each member's review comments or > discuss items has been given a unique integer identifier e.g. "Ben Kaduk's > TLS Comment 1". Since the titles are not super descriptive, one approach to > considering if you have an interest in a particular issue is to look at our > response email to each ballot response, which provides the issue link > underneath each of the reviewers' comments. > > Many of these issues are editorial and under the remit of our editors to > address. Some will be assessed as duplicates or to require no specification > changes - aka close with no action. Some might be more thorny, especially > anything related to DISCUSS items. We'll send separate emails to boost the > visibility of these if it looks like spec changes are needed. > > Cheers, > Lucas > On behalf of QUIC WG Chairs > > > >
