Hi, My current judgment is also that this will result in that the HTTP/3 and QPACK specs will end up in missref due to these references. I don't think there is an good option. The new HTTP specs are substantial rewrites so going back to RFC 723x doesn't make sense here, and likely include substantial amount of work.
I do think the WG do need to be clear if the message is to stay with the the prelimenary versions, if that is h-29 or declare a h-34 based on the forthcoming -34 versions and what to do with salts and keys. Cheers Magnus
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
