Events without label "editorial"
Issues
------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+4/-0/💬15)
4 issues created:
- Revert Spurious Congestion Event (by nibanks)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4836
- clarify how to handle in increase in initial_max_{stream_}data_{uni, bidi} (by marten-seemann)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4834
- Recovery: Initialization of min_rtt when used with Cubic (by WesleyRosenblum)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4833
- Incorrect reference to stream state section from frame description (by tfpauly)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4832
3 issues received 15 new comments:
- #4836 Revert Spurious Congestion Event (7 by LPardue, huitema, junhochoi,
nibanks)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4836 [-recovery]
- #4834 clarify how to handle in increase in initial_max_{stream_}data_{uni, bidi} (3 by kazuho, marten-seemann, martinthomson)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4834 [-transport]
- #4833 Recovery: Initialization of min_rtt when used with Cubic (5 by LPardue, WesleyRosenblum, ianswett)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4833
* quicwg/ops-drafts (+3/-0/💬5)
3 issues created:
- draft-ietf-quic-manageability-10 Feedback 4.5 (by jaredmauch)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/290
- draft-ietf-quic-manageability-10 Feedback (by jaredmauch)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/289
- Make it more clear that streams are not ordered (by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/286 [-applicability]
3 issues received 5 new comments:
- #242 Section 4.8.2.: Forcing address stability (1 by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/242 [-manageability] [NAT section] [has PR]
- #197 App: What does "prime a CC" mean? (3 by martinduke, martinthomson, mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/197 [-applicability] [meeting-agenda]
- #178 Sect 2.7: Telling middleboxes to ignore version? (1 by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/178 [-manageability] [meeting-agenda]
* quicwg/datagram (+0/-0/💬21)
5 issues received 21 new comments:
- #15 Exposing datagram acknowledgements (11 by DavidSchinazi, LPardue,
huitema, nibanks)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/15
- #8 Text on Datagram's Interaction with Loss Recovery is a bit Light (1 by janaiyengar)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/8
- #6 No streams in datagrams? (3 by LPardue, ekinnear, skissane)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/6
- #3 Specify Max Payload Size instead of Max Frame Size (5 by DavidSchinazi, huitema, martinthomson)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/3
- #2 Consider retransmission bit leakage (1 by martinthomson)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/2
* quicwg/load-balancers (+3/-1/💬3)
3 issues created:
- Reduce load of Dynamic SID allocation (by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/101
- Consider an alternative name to 'arbitrary' algorithm (by ianswett)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/99
- Consider an alternative name to 'non-compliant' (by ianswett)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/98
3 issues received 3 new comments:
- #101 Reduce load of Dynamic SID allocation (1 by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/101
- #99 Consider an alternative name to 'arbitrary' algorithm (1 by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/99
- #98 Consider an alternative name to 'non-compliant' (1 by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/98
1 issues closed:
- Retry service handling of non-Initial https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/96
* quicwg/version-negotiation (+1/-0/💬1)
1 issues created:
- Terminological precision (by wbl)
https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/32
1 issues received 1 new comments:
- #32 Terminological precision (1 by DavidSchinazi)
https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/32
Pull requests
-------------
* quicwg/ops-drafts (+3/-0/💬7)
3 pull requests submitted:
- Rewrite sentence about probes to prime cc (by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/291
- Connections aren't reset, they are closed. (by mjoras)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/288
- Reword TFO/0-rtt sentence. (by mjoras)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/287
6 pull requests received 7 new comments:
- #287 Reword TFO/0-rtt sentence. (1 by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/287
- #279 Remove line about use of 0xff (2 by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/279 [-manageability] [meeting-agenda]
- #272 Rewrite NAT section to minimum text (1 by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/272 [-manageability] [next revision] [ready-to-merge]
- #257 rewrite NAT section (1 by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/257 [-manageability] [next revision]
- #256 Recommendation for NATs and consequences of using CID (1 by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/256 [-manageability] [next revision]
- #233 Recommendation on ACKing (1 by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/233 [-applicability] [meeting-agenda]
* quicwg/load-balancers (+1/-1/💬4)
1 pull requests submitted:
- Changing wording about server/service synchronization (by fiestajetsam)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/100
1 pull requests received 4 new comments:
- #100 Changing wording about server/service synchronization (4 by martinduke,
wbl)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/100
1 pull requests merged:
- Clarify Retry Service handling of non-Initial Packets
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/97
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/datagram
* https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers
* https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation
