Hi Marten, On Fri, 23 Apr 2021, 13:19 Marten Seemann, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Matt shared the recording with me and I was able to watch it today. Thank > you for that. > > In general, a processing time of 10 working days seems way too long to be > useful for people who want to actively participate in the work. Interim > meetings usually cause a lot of activity on the mailing list, and it's hard > to participate in a discussion if you know that you're missing all of the > context. After 10 working days, most discussions will most likely have > moved on or arrived at a conclusion. > Is there any better way we can come up with for future meetings? Sharing > the recording in a Google Drive wouldn't be a bad solution. > I appreciate your points and agree. Everything we can do to make the WG participation as equivalent as possible is useful. 10 working days is an upper limit based on some factors outside the secretariat control (such as how long it takes WebEx to present the recording, how long YouTube encoding takes) and some factors in their control (such as batching the manual work to upload). Mirja pointed out to the chairs that we can request the secretariat to expedite the upload part, so leave that with us. Looking ahead, there is work going on that would allow interim meetings to be held via MeetEcho. I'm not sure if that affects the turnaround time for YouTube upload, so I've asked the question. Cheers Lucas
