It is likely this will happen in the Friday session. If people have a strong preference to do this in the Thursday session, please let me know and I'll see what can be done.
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 7:15 AM Lars Eggert <[email protected]> wrote: > Heads up that NFS-over-QUIC is being scheduled for discussion in the NFSv4 > WG at IETF-111. > > Thanks, > Lars > > > Begin forwarded message: > > *From: *"Noveck, David" <[email protected]> > *Subject: **[nfsv4] Current agenda for wg meeting as part of IETF111* > *Date: *July 7, 2021 at 13:25:27 GMT+3 > *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" < > [email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > This is very preliminary and I urge anyone who knows anything relevant > that is not being addressed to speak up soon. > > It appears that we have a fair amount of extra time available for > additional presentations but there is no prospect of fitting everything > into a single one-hour session, without rushing people. > > I have treated the two sessions as a single meeting, which it is. For > example, there is time for note-well and agenda bashing only once. > > This ordering makes sense to me. If anyone would like a re-ordering, for > example, to enable use of a one-day pass, let me know and I’ll change > things as necessary. > > Who > Time > Subject > Detail > DN > 10 min. > Misc. > Introduction, note-well, agenda-bashing. Discussion of note-taking. > DN > 15 min. > 5661bis > Discussion of current state of the rfc5661bis effort, including the > associated NFSv4-wide documents. > DN > 15 min. > Security > Discussion of draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-security-00 (to be submitted soon) and > future plans to move forward in this area. > CEL > 15 min. > Ror v2 > Discussion of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-version-two-05, > draft-ietf-nfsv4-nfs-ulb-v2-05 > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-nfs-ulb-v2/> and > needed steps on the way to WGLC. > CEL > 15 min. > Quic > Discussion of the path forward for NFSv4 to enable use of this transport. > All > 20 min. > Future work > Discussion of things the working group should be doing and that have not > been done, including: > > - Things we planned to do but never followed up on, including > pNFS-NVMe and pNFS-RDMA. > - New ideas to address other needs which are part of our charter but > have not been given serious attention > > > _______________________________________________ > nfsv4 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4 > > >
