On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 12:37 PM Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> wrote:
> Good luck Philip. > Maybe you like to reinvent the wheel? > > Behcet > That is exactly the objection people made to HTTP in the first place. That is the objection to QUIC - why not stay with TCP? QUIC is highly optimized to one use case. It is large, it is very complex. At this point, I have not seen anyone show how to layer Web Services over HTTP over QUIC. I do not expect *an* answer to that question, I expect dozens of them only some of which are interoperable. The assertion infrastructure adopted in SAML was originally designed as part of TAXI which was a design commission I was given to re-invent PKIX in XML. I am not alone in looking at alternatives to QUIC going forward. If you want to understand the design choices in QUIC going forward the best way is to design your own.
