These look good to me; even though I’m really not the expert here…
From: QUIC <[email protected]> on behalf of Lucas Pardue <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, 3. November 2021 at 23:55 To: QUIC WG <[email protected]> Cc: QUIC WG Chairs <[email protected]> Subject: Consensus call for HTTP/3 and QPACK issues Hello WG, We've had a few issues pop up on the HTTP/3 and QPACK specifications while we've been waiting in the RFC editor queue. Like last time, our responsible AD has asked us to run a consensus call to ensure that the WG is happy with the proposed changes, before incorporating them into the documents as part of AUTH48. This email begins a 2-week consensus call (ending November 17 2021, anywhere on earth). Absent any pushback, we'll work with our AD on the next steps for incorporation. * Disagreement in handling of unknown unidirectional stream types #4929 - the proposed resolution is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4942<https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=29493354-76d20a51-294973cf-86959e472243-ef0eb808623bf195&q=1&e=75d18452-aa6b-4ba6-87bc-0824c536e72c&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fquicwg%2Fbase-drafts%2Fpull%2F4942> * Clarify client behavior on receiving 421 #4934 - the proposed resolution is to close with no action * negative base values #4938 - the proposed resolution is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4940<https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=d83647ab-87ad7eae-d8360730-86959e472243-d357d920fc99f3aa&q=1&e=75d18452-aa6b-4ba6-87bc-0824c536e72c&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fquicwg%2Fbase-drafts%2Fpull%2F4940> * CONNECT might be under-specified #4939 - the proposed resolution is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4941<https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=6ec0a133-315b9836-6ec0e1a8-86959e472243-60269bf39928e1a1&q=1&e=75d18452-aa6b-4ba6-87bc-0824c536e72c&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fquicwg%2Fbase-drafts%2Fpull%2F4941> Best Regards, Matt & Lucas QUIC WG Chairs
