I’ve switched this to the standard "Discussion Venues” section that gets automatically added. (See editor’s copy, https://quicwg.org/datagram/draft-ietf-quic-datagram.html <https://quicwg.org/datagram/draft-ietf-quic-datagram.html>).
Thanks, Tommy > On Dec 6, 2021, at 11:04 AM, Lucas Pardue <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the review Zahed > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 6:17 PM Tommy Pauly <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hi Zahed, > > Thanks for the review! > >> On Dec 6, 2021, at 5:53 AM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for well written and short document. >> >> This document have following text in the abstract and introduction – >> >> “Discussion of this work is encouraged to happen on the QUIC IETF mailing >> list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> or on the GitHub repository which >> contains the draft: https://github.com/quicwg/datagram >> <https://github.com/quicwg/datagram>.” >> >> I don’t think we need to have them at this stage of this document. Please >> remove them. > > Looking at RFC9000, this was around even in the last version prior to RFC > publication (draft-ietf-quic-transport-34). I don’t think it’s beneficial to > remove this now. > > +1, As a compromise, perhaps add an RFC editor note to remove the note before > publication? > > Cheers > Lucas
