Thanks David and Martin, your comments are now reflected in the editor's copy. I'll cut a new draft when WGLC is over.
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 2:31 PM David Schinazi <[email protected]> wrote: > I've also reviewed the document and think it is mostly ready to go. I've > opened a few issues and PRs but they're all minor. > > I'll note that it makes me sad that we've designed QUICv2 in such a way > that it can't serve its anti-ossification purpose by itself, but hopefully > we'll figure that out later. > > David > > On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 6:37 PM Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This is ready to go. >> >> I've opened a few pull requests for some extraordinary nit-picky things, >> but I'm happy to let those go if there is any push-back. I've implemented >> this and the spec does a good job of mapping out the interoperability >> requirements, including a bunch of the fiddly stuff that is not immediately >> obvious from the outset. It's good work. >> >> On Tue, May 17, 2022, at 10:08, Lucas Pardue wrote: >> > Hello QUIC WG, >> > >> > This email announces the WGLC of the QUIC version 2 draft[1]. This >> > document is tightly scoped to changing trivial details of the wire >> > protocol to combat ossification. Having another formal QUIC version >> > also complements the QUIC version negotiation work. There are multiple >> > interoperating implementations of QUIC version 2. >> > >> > This last call will run for 2 weeks, finishing on May 30 2022 Anywhere >> > on Earth. Please direct responses as issues on GitHub[2], or in >> > response to this thread. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Lucas & Matt >> > QUIC WG Chairs >> > >> > [1] - https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-quic-v2-03.html >> > [2] - https://github.com/quicwg/quic-v2/issues >> >>
