Hello QUIC WG, As part of the AD review of the Version Negotiation draft [1], the question was raised about whether it should update RFC 9000; see issue #115 [2]. As a reminder, an RFC can include an "Updates" tag that refers to another target RFC, the target in turn will receive an "Updated by" tag.
Generally, the use of and meaning of the Updates tag can be ambiguous. There is no blanket rule to determine if an Updates tag is required for RFCs that extend QUIC. For example, we didn't add one for QUIC bit grease [3]. Our responsible AD, Zahed, has asked for a consensus call to determine whether the Version Negotiation draft should include an Updates tag or not. This is the start of a two week consensus call, it will conclude on 2022-09-24, End of Day, Anywhere on Earth. Please respond on the issue directly [2], or in response to this email. Cheers, Lucas On behalf of the QUIC WG Chairs [1] - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-quic-version-negotiation-09 [2] - https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/115 [3] - https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9287.html
