> On 10 Sep 2022, at 00:46, Martin Duke <[email protected]> wrote: > > (AD hat on) > > I agree that a congestion control WG would be a fine venue for this; as it's > not even chartered, we could incorporate. However, as that process is going > slower than I'd like, the authors are welcome to try tsvwg if they don't want > to wait.
+1 to what Martin said here. And I concur with the chairs call here. //Zahed > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 10:50 AM Matt Joras <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hello all, > > To close the loop here, we'd like to thank all respondents to the call for > adoption. The chairs' sense of the feedback is that while this is useful work > that people support at the IETF, it is work in a problem space is more > broadly to do with congestion control and not entirely QUIC specific. As > such, this work is most likely suited to another working group. > Coincidentally, parallel to the adoption call for careful resume, the > Transport Area ADs launched a proposal for a new congestion control focused > WG. This was discussed on the TSVAREA list and during the IETF 114 session, > with next steps posted to the list [1]. A few respondents identified that > this new group, should it form, would be a suitable venue for such a document. > Based on the feedback we have received, together with other activity in the > IETF, the chairs have judged there is not currently consensus for adopting > careful resume to the QUIC WG. > > Matt & Lucas > [1] - > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-area/r_4jPmT55sKl0iumvIPklITb9gc/ > <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-area/r_4jPmT55sKl0iumvIPklITb9gc/> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 4:59 AM Piers O'Hanlon <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > I agree it would something useful to work on (given the Linux Kernel has > provided something similar for tcp with its `ip tcp_metrics` for some time) > but it seems more general so other working groups could benefit from. > > > > > On 25 Jul 2022, at 17:16, Lucas Pardue <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Reminder: the adoption call ends in several hours. > > > > If you have yet to comment, please do so soon. > > > > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
