Hi Behcet,
On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 5:56 PM Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Christian, > > I quickly glanced through RFC 9250 which defines DoQ and references ALPN > in RFC 7301. > Agree with Philip that DoQ does not define something that is independent > of HTTP. > > Will it come one day, we don't know? > Behcet > DoQ is an application mapping over QUIC. ALPN is an extension to TLS. DoQ might use a transactional model that maps to bidirectional streams but that is the full extent of similarities to HTTP; there is no normative dependency. RFC 9000 was written carefully to describe the interface that application-data-bearing streams can provide to applications. This is not related to HTTP, QUIC is independent of HTTP. Indeed, QUIC on its own means pretty much nothing. It needs an application mapping protocol. The recently-published applicability draft, RFC 9308 [1], is specifically written to aid designers or implementers of such mappings. Randy might find RFC 9308 informative if wishing to pursue QUIC as a transport substrate for the OT application layer traffic. Cheers Lucas [1] - https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9308.html
