Hi folks, Why do we require reviews from all three QUIC IANA designated experts instead of round robin or first response? This practice is unusual compared to other registries and sounds like it will introduce significant delays.
Thanks, David On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 8:46 AM Martin Duke <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, permanent > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 5:10 PM Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I can approve the registration, but the draft should be requesting a >> *permanent* registration. It is currently provisional. >> >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2022, at 06:16, Ian Swett wrote: >> > This looks good to me. Please wait for Jana or Martin to respond as >> > well before finalizing. >> > >> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 2:08 PM David Dong via RT >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Dear Jana, Ian, Martin (cc: quic wg), >> >> >> >> As the designated experts for the QUIC Versions registry, can you >> review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-quic-v2 for us? Please see >> >> >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-v2/ >> >> >> >> The due date is 24 Oct 2022. >> >> >> >> If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, >> we'll make the registration at >> >> >> >> https://www.iana.org/assignments/quic/ >> >> >> >> We'll wait for all three reviewers to respond unless you tell us >> otherwise. >> >> >> >> With thanks, >> >> >> >> David Dong >> >> IANA Services Specialist >> >>
