Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-quic-version-negotiation-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-version-negotiation/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # GEN AD review of draft-ietf-quic-version-negotiation-12 CC @larseggert Thanks to Robert Sparks for the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/q4nfiA-lk3-dpm66IdFh8oGUOr0). ## Nits All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you did with these suggestions. ### Grammar/style #### Section 1, paragraph 2 ``` al versions are broadly similar to the the previous version. This specificat ^^^^^^^ ``` Possible typo: you repeated a word. #### Section 4, paragraph 5 ``` ated version. If the client would have selected a different version, the cli ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` Did you mean "had selected"? ## Notes This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT]. [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments [IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool
