I am tempted to say yes to that but I worry that problems in handshaking
could cause unneeded lag. This could cause crashing I would think.
Kevin
my software store:
https://ko-fi.com/kjsisco56927
On 12/1/2022 11:41 AM, Martin Duke wrote:
Relatedly, if I roll a new QUIC version field, should I also rev the
salt, retry key, and so on?
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 8:41 AM Matt Joras <[email protected]> wrote:
Greetings QUIC WG,
We are currently in a situation where the v2 and Version
Negotiation documents are stalled pending IANA assignments. MT
raised this issue recently on the list[1], and we are boosting
visibility once again since these allocations have implications
for anyone who has deployed VN/v2 code, as changes will likely
cause negotiation failures. We are currently leaning towards going
with MT's suggestion, which is to allocate new codepoints for the
VN transport parameter as well as the v2 version. Please provide
any feedback for/against either in this thread or the original.
Best,
Matt & Lucas
QUIC WG Chairs
[1]
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/f4kdku9pqI6raepT_L3z_pth3Uo/
