I've updated quic-go to the new values, and I can confirm that the test vectors are correct.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 12:42 PM Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 11, 2022, at 09:54, Martin Duke wrote: > > I would appreciate a sanity check. If anyone has tooling to re: the > > test vectors that can double-check my tooling, that would be much > > appreciated. > > Sanity check provided. I think that you might want to try again on the > sha256sum invocations. > >
