> On 10 Feb 2023, at 09.21, Boris Pismenny <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the information. I didn't know it was possible to register custom > versions of QUIC/DTLS. Are there any examples of that? What would be the > process of proposing one?
I cannot speak to DTLS, but QUIC version discussion is discussed here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9000.html#name-registration-policies-for-q <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9000.html#name-registration-policies-for-q> it is worth noting that there is also a QUIC invariant document that any version should adhere to: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8999.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8999.html> Mikkel
