My initial reaction at the meeting was privacy leak and I was expecting the 
hard negative feedback that happened.  In theory, using a path aware 
application implies consent of the user to trade some privacy for some other 
benefit.  In practice, though, the user is probably not aware of what the 
application is doing.
Thinking about it some more, though,...
The QUIC working group is very focused on individual users.  But, there are 
other uses of the Internet.  A business might very well both be aware of and 
want the trade for path optimization re cost, latency, etc.  In fact, the 
specific application might have been selected for that reason.  I don't know 
that the specific mechanism in the document is the right one.  (It might or 
might not be.)  I just wanted to point out there are use cases where privacy 
might matter less than other considerations.

John

Reply via email to