The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9114,
"HTTP/3".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7702

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Lucas Pardue <[email protected]>

Section: 10.7

Original Text
-------------
Where
HTTP/2
employs
PADDING
frames
and
Padding
fields
in
other
frames
to
make
a
connection
more
resistant
to
traffic
analysis,
HTTP/3
can
either
rely
on
transport-layer
padding
or
employ
the
reserved
frame
and
stream
types
discussed
in
Sections
7.2.8
and
6.2.3.

Corrected Text
--------------
Where
HTTP/2
employs
Padding
fields
in
some
frames
to
make
a
connection
more
resistant
to
traffic
analysis,
HTTP/3
can
either
rely
on
transport-layer
padding
or
employ
the
reserved
frame
and
stream
types
discussed
in
Sections
7.2.8
and
6.2.3.

Notes
-----
HTTP/2 doesn't define PADDING frames

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC9114 (draft-ietf-quic-http-34)
--------------------------------------
Title               : HTTP/3
Publication Date    : June 2022
Author(s)           : M. Bishop, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : QUIC
Area                : Transport
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

Reply via email to