Hi, I've reviewed draft-ietf-quic-reliable-stream-reset-05 and, from a spec perspective, I believe this is ready to move forward. However, I'm not sure we have sufficient implementation and deployment experience. That probably shouldn't block IESG review, but I'd suggest waiting until we have a bit more experience before sending this from the IESG to the RFC editor's queue.
David On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 6:45 PM Lucas Pardue <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello QUIC WG, > > This email announces the Working Group Last Call (WGLC) of the Reliable > QUIC Stream Resets draft [1] [2]. > > At IETF 118 the sense of the room was this draft was ready. The authors > have been working on some final i dotting and t crossing and have recently > closed out all open issues on the GitHub repo [3]. > > The WGLC runs for 2 weeks, finishing on February 08 Anywhere on Earth. > Please direct feedback as issues on GitHub [3], or in response to this > thread on the QUIC mailing list. > > Thanks, > Lucas & Matt > QUIC WG Chairs > > [1] - > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-reliable-stream-reset/ > [2] - > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-reliable-stream-reset/05/ > [3] - https://github.com/quicwg/reliable-stream-reset > -- > Webtransport mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport >
