Hi, Based on the discussion here I would agree with Martin that we can reject this errata.
/Zahed On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 2:24 PM Martin Thomson <m...@lowentropy.net> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2024, at 17:58, Michael Eriksson wrote: > > The sender (peer) will not generate an RTT sample in scenario A, see > > Section 5.1 of RFC 9002: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9002.html#name-generating-rtt-samples > > Of course. > > For others: "An RTT sample MUST NOT be generated on receiving an ACK frame > that does not newly acknowledge at least one ack-eliciting packet." > > > In scenario B, the RTT sample is inflated by design: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9002.html#section-5.3-5 > > Great. So no change needed :) > > My conclusion then is that the erratum can be rejected. > >
