On Thu, Mar 27, 2025, at 09:44, Kazuho Oku wrote: > I do not think we can agree on a single API that defines how > applications and QUIC stacks should communicate, nor would it be a good > idea to do so.
I completely agree. Though with things like DATAGRAM, RESET_STREAM_AT and some of the discussion about how webtransport might implement another layer of flow control, there are still some open questions about how the general shape of the interface might change over time. I don't know if that is what Alan was getting at, but it seems like there is at least some work to be done there, if only to evolve https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9000#name-operations-on-streams
