Thanks for the feedback, I completely agree that we want to make this as straightforward as possible.
I wrote a PR to propose a way forward, but I'd appreciate feedback: https://github.com/wcsmith/draft-quic-receive-ts/pull/17 Thanks, Ian On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 5:51 AM Lars Eggert <l...@eggert.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Apr 17, 2025, at 11:09, Kazuho Oku <kazuho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Though I kind of wonder if we could agree on how to annotate ACK > packets. At the moment, Multipath QUIC adds a path identifier and uses a > different frame type. This pull request adds a new field for acks, reusing > the original frame type. > > > > I think people have argued that we do not need to develop an encoding > scheme that allows extensions add new fields to the ACK frame. I fully > agree with that. > > > > But at the same time, I wonder if extensions could agree on one way of > annotating ACKs rather than trying to define their own ways. > > agree with Kazuho. It seems like there is a desire to muck with the ACK > format/content; let's try and ake this minimally painful for implementers. > > Thanks, > Lars > > >
