Mohamed Boucadair has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-quic-03-02: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-quic/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi all,

I used [1] to review the charter changes. Please find below some comments:

# Any plan to update the deployment considerations?

As I see item#2 touched as well, I have the following questions:

## I wonder whether the WG has considered to do a refresh of RFC 9312 to
reflect more deployment experience.

## The load-balancer item was promised to be sent to the IESG back to 2021. Are
there specific issues with this spec? I see the doc is still active, wonder
whether there is a target publication date for this one?

## Given the various foo-over-QUIC out there, developing some guidance for the
authors of such documents would be helpful. Not sure if that was considered by
the WG.

# Consider adding a milestone for the new Item#4, in particular.

# nits

## HTTP WG was concluded; consider updating to httpbis

CURRENT:
  The QUIC WG originated HTTP/3, the mapping of HTTP to QUIC, and the
  QPACK header compression scheme. These specifications are now
  maintained in the HTTP WG.

## Better flow

I would move this text to be under item#3, with some minor edits:

OLD:
  Defining new congestion control schemes is explicitly out of scope for
  the WG. However, new QUIC extensions that support development and
  experimentation with new congestion control schemes may fall under the
  third work area.

NEW:
  Defining new congestion control schemes is explicitly out of scope for
  the WG. However, new QUIC extensions that support development and
  experimentation with new congestion control schemes is within scope.

Thank you.

Cheers,
Med

[1]
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fcharter-ietf-quic%2Fwithmilestones-03.txt&url2=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fcharter-ietf-quic%2Fwithmilestones-03-02.txt&difftype=--hwdiff



Reply via email to