Hi all. Lars' side meeting entry piqued my interest, so I ventured into here.
On Mon, 29 Sept 2025 at 10:16, Ross Finlayson <finlay...@live555.com> wrote: > > 2. Website owners are reluctant to enable HTTP/3. > > Or website owners *cannot* enable HTTP/3. Remember that the Apache web > server - which according to some statistics implements more than 25% of all > websites - still does not support HTTP/3 (QUIC). > There's another possibility: website owners have the ability to upgrade from h2 to h3, but in trials they find that server CPU penalty is too high. I don't run a server with significant load, but from a hallway conversation I've heard that the consequent drop in the supportable flows per server is too large. This is obviously dependent on the particular implementation and nature of the traffic load. Chris
