Hi folks,

With chair hat on:

The Datatracker suprised me a bit with the automated email :-)

To add a little more colour to the adoption call, it begins the formal 
consensus process for adopting a document as a starting point to addressing the 
fourth area of work in our charter.

We saw some strong signals of support for adoption of the draft during the IETF 
124 meeting. There were some people opposed at the time, some of which appeared 
to be related to concerns on versioning and ossification. Since the meeting a 
draft 01 was published that incorporates some feedback on these matters.

Please respond on the list to indicate your opinion of adoption of the draft to 
the QUIC WG. 

Cheers,
Lucas & Matt
QUIC WG Chairs

----- Original message -----
From: Lucas Pardue via Datatracker <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Call for adoption: draft-opik-quic-qmux-01  (Ends 2025-12-16)
Date: Wednesday, December 03, 2025 01:03


Subject: Call for adoption: draft-opik-quic-qmux-01  (Ends 2025-12-16)

This message starts a 2-week Call for Adoption for this document.

Abstract:
   This document specifies QMux version 1.  QMux version 1 provides,
   over bi-directional streams such as TLS, the same set of stream and
   datagram operations that applications rely upon in QUIC version 1.

Discussion Venues

   This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

   Discussion of this document takes place on the QUIC Working Group
   mailing list ([email protected]), which is archived at
   https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/.

   Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
   https://github.com/kazuho/draft-opik-quic-qmux.

File can be retrieved from:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-opik-quic-qmux/

Please reply to this message keeping [email protected] in copy by indicating
whether you support or not the adoption of this draft as a WG document.
Comments to motivate your preference are highly appreciated.

Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual
Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2].
Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions
of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any.
Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be
found at [3].

Thank you.
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/




Reply via email to