Hi

On Tue, Jul 7, 2026, at 03:25, Dan Wing wrote:
> It seems this should mimic what we would do for TCP, and may well be purview 
> of the Happy WG (https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/happy/about/).
> 
> I would lean heavily towards your solution (2), but using SVCB and HTTPS 
> resource records (rather than solely AAAA), as those have more robust 
> semantics.  Somewhat related to your question, see also Erik's recent post 
> about draft-nygren-dnsop-ipv6only-indicator sent to several working groups, 
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/VaaERK1-riWFauEqbuoZzPZx_x4.
> 
> -d
> 
> 
> > On Jul 6, 2026, at 6:23 AM, Stefano Duo 
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I'm trying to solve the following common scenario: a client has a QUIC 
> > connection to a server's IPv6 address and has to migrate the connection to 
> > an IPv4-only network.
> > 
> > Currently, our implementation will attempt to connect to the server's IPv6 
> > address via the IPv4-only network and will (expectedly) fail.
> > 
> > I can think of two main solutions, the client could instead migrate to the 
> > IPv4:
> >     • Provided in the preferred_address extension, during the initial TLS 
> > handshake
> >     • Returned by the A query, that was sent alongside the AAAA query that 
> > contained the IPv6 address currently being used by the client
> > 
> > From past discussions in the archive, I understand that preferred_address's 
> > main intent is to support a one-time only, server-initiated migration for 
> > anycast deployments that do not support connection ID-based routing. It's 
> > not clear to me whether #1 would be an abuse of preferred_address.
> > 
> > As per #2, there are no technical guarantees that the A result will lead us 
> > to a machine that has the necessary state to migrate successfully. It is 
> > also explicitly not covered by section 9 of RFC 9000.
> > 
> > Has this scenario been discussed before? Is there any guidance on how to 
> > handle this correctly?
You might also be interested in Marco and Marten's draft 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-munizaga-quic-alternative-server-address/

> > 
> > Thank you,
> > Stefano
> 
> 

Reply via email to