On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 03:50:11PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 09:58:53PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 May 2005 19:32, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 07:52:50PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > I have some other thoughts on how it could work (such as adding a > > > > "committed-patches" file, etc) but I thought I would test the waters > > > > first. Would such a command be accepted for quilt? > > > > > > I thought for sure this would elicit some kind of comment. Is it just > > > that > > > nobody has had the time to look at the patch?
I usually leave to Andreas all important decisions. It's far more convinient for me ;) > > I didn't have enough time so far, sorry. From a very brief look the command > > seems to be quite specific, and I wouldn't really call this a commit. There > > are users who keep the patches themselves under version control, and in > > that > > context a commit is totally different. I'm in that kind of people. Indeed, the name is bad for me. > Ok, I'm not too concerned with the name. It's the functionality of the > command > that I would like to get added. Basically, you're done with a patch and now > you > want to have quilt "forget" a patch is applied. > > It could be called "quilt finalize" perhaps? I'm open to suggestions. If Andreas approves the functionality (which is good, IMHO), finalize would be a much better name. But there's a "if" in my sentence... ;) Bye, Mt.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Quilt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev
