Hi Andreas, [Andreas Gruenbacher] > I've removed tac from the cvs, so the problem doesn't exist anymore.
Good thing, thanks :) I like the new implementation, it's shorter, cleaner and I'd guess faster. However... > + for (([EMAIL PROTECTED]; n>0; n--)) Shouldn't this be n>=0? Looks to me like we're missing the bottom-most patch now. > The relevant issue here was process startup time though, especially > when files were not in the cache. Perl starts relatively slow > compared to something as simple as tac. Agreed. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ Quilt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev
