On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 06:42:05PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > Note that I did _not_ fully update "import" as there seemed to be some > > disagreement on the recent option renaming from -n to -P. Depending on > > the outcome, we may need to update bash_completion again before the > > release. > > I don't see an advantage in using -n instead of -P (and thus reverting the -n > to -p change). Does anybody think that -P as used in import vs. -P as used in > other commands would confuse users?
If no one else is attached to -n then there's certainly no need to keep it around. My concern is purely personal, of course--I type 'import -n' almost daily, and I rarely use -p/-P on the commands which have it. On the other hand, we won't really know until it's packaged and begins to spread; and then it'll be too late. I'm not going to object too much. Compared to adding -P to things like push/pop, this is nothing. Dean _______________________________________________ Quilt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev
