On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 04:26:09PM +0100, Jan Blunck wrote: > This patch adds a hook function that is called during refresh. At that point > in time an user specified script can be called. If the hook function signals > no error the refresh is permitted.
I guess I don't understand why anyone would want to fail the refresh. I'm often using refresh for incremental work--even when I don't yet have code that compiles I still have to refresh so I can pop and go work on some other patch. Wouldn't it make more sense to have your sign-off/acked-by hook attached to the 'mail' operation? Why would the act of typing 'refresh' equate to acknowledging a patch? Dean _______________________________________________ Quilt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev
