On Friday 18 March 2011 06:32:18 pm Kaz Kylheku wrote: > Plus a few more fixes. It's behaving well for me now. I'm ready > for stress-testing with big patch stacks.
May I ask why you keep investing time in a task which I just told you I have _already_ accomplished? > (...) > Index: quilt/backup-files > =================================================================== > --- quilt.orig/backup-files > +++ quilt/backup-files > @@ -16,8 +16,9 @@ > # pass-through mode). > # - Use tree-to-tree recursive cp to restore a backup (taking > everything Please fix your e-mail client, it is wrapping long lines, which corrupts every patch or script you send to the list. > # in the backup, ignoring the file list). > -# - To touch files on restore, if requested, we can do a find + > xargs + > -# touch over the backup instead, prior to restoring it. [WRONG] > +# - We don't use hard linking when restoring files, because then we > have > +# to break the hard links anyway (quilt issues a noop -L > operation). +# - To touch restored files, we can do a copy without > preserving timestamps. > # - Added files (i.e. backups of nonexistent files) are represented > as a > # specially named file containing an explicit list, and not as > # zero-length files. This eases the implementation, and lets us > back @@ -209,7 +210,9 @@ B ) -- Jean Delvare Suse L3 _______________________________________________ Quilt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev
