On 01/12/2015 07:11 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> If a patch file has hard links, refreshing it should break the links
> so that the other copies are left unmodified. Test this behavior to
> avoid breaking it accidentally.
> ---
> Jason, I'm afraid your patch breaks this test case. I think that the
> following test:
>
>     [ -L "$filename" -a "$QUILT_NO_RM_SYMLINKS" != "yes" ]
>
> should instead read:
>
>     [ ! -L "$filename" -o "$QUILT_NO_RM_SYMLINKS" != "yes" ]


I would agree.  I tried your new test, with the v2 version and all is
well.

I am not one to argue in the value of regression testing, and now
we'll have a test hardlinks and symlinks. :-)

Cheers,
Jason.




_______________________________________________
Quilt-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev

Reply via email to