> I haven't tried it with Quixote 1.  You'd have to compare Q1's
> SessionPublisher class with Q2's Publisher, and possibly modify it to call
> the SessionManager methods the same way the latter does.  The Session
> class itself is the same, just .is_dirty() is missing.

Thanks for the response! I finally decided to use WSGI session
middleware instead [1] together with old version of QWIP (for Quixote
1).
After all it's nice to have session module framework-independant,
since I use both Quixote and Aquarium :)

[1] http://www.saddi.com/software/flup/
-- 
Ksenia
_______________________________________________
Quixote-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.mems-exchange.org/mailman/listinfo/quixote-users

Reply via email to