On Aug 11, 2005, at 5:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should Quixote's publisher give the same result
when PATH_INFO is 'foo/bar' that it gives
when PATH_INFO is '/foo/bar' ?
I don't know what to think about this, but it does seem good to
do something other than trip on the assert.
Well, what else could "foo/bar" mean? It's really the fault of the
server, but we might as well make Quixote flexible for misplaced
slashes,
especially when the specs are not as clear as they should be.
I *suppose* that whenever the PATH_INFO is not a string
that starts with '/', you could return a permanent
redirect to SCRIPT_NAME + '/' + PATH_INFO
This would cover the empty case the same way as this odd case.
_______________________________________________
Quixote-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.mems-exchange.org/mailman/listinfo/quixote-users
