On Aug 31, 2005, at 2:50 PM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
 Perhaps, rather than a
"register_" pattern, we could just put PTL's own transformers in a
pair of lists (source_transformers, tree_transformers) at the module
level; interested parties could manipulate the lists, inserting their
handlers in the appropriate places. Thoughts?

It might be even more explicit to just have a
source_transformer and tree_transfomer at the module level,
where the source transformer is the interested party's desired
composition of source_transform functions, and similarly for
the tree_transformer.


_______________________________________________
Quixote-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.mems-exchange.org/mailman/listinfo/quixote-users

Reply via email to