On Sep 16, 2005, at 3:25 PM, mario ruggier wrote:

Hi,

imagine several packages for the same application, installed simultaneously on the same machine. These can be for example a recent stable/demo version, and a bleeding edge dev version. I want to be able to run them concurrently, but independently. To run with either simple_server or scgi_server, I am executing the respective python scripts as new processes, that implies that if I adjust os.path in the calling process, I cannot pass that env info to the child process. Or can I?

Looking at the code, I wonder whether it is (a) a good idea and (b) possible to be able to pass on to whichever server a parameter to add a specific dir to its os.path. I was imagining that either the factory param takes the form of
- str : as it is currently...
- (str, str) : a 2-tuple of str, where the frist str will be interpreted as a dir to add to os.path

Then, the quixote.util.import_object(name) is similarly modified, e.g. to:

quixote.util.import_object(name, add_to_path=None):
        if add_to_path is not None:
                if add_to_path not in os.path:
                        sys.path.insert(0, add_to_path)
        ...
        rest of function as as currently

This does not work as advertised, because it is not possible to pass a tuple as a shell script parameter ;-(

Another way would be to add an "add_to_path" option to the various server scripts, that will then be handled separately (and before) from the import_object() call.

This does work. For example, all that is necessary is to wrap the call to parse_args() (in the main() or equivalent of each server script e.g. in quixote.server.scgi_server.main) with the following:

main():
    ....
    parser.add_option(
        '--prepend-import-path', dest="path", default=None,
        help="Prepend path to python's import path")
    (options, args) = parser.parse_args()
    if options.path is not None:
        import sys
        sys.path.insert(0, options.path)

Then, when run() is called, import_object(factory) works as expected.

Does this sound reasonable, or is there a much simple way to do this?

I guess another way to do this is to launch by importing and calling the respective server run(). But this has other non-desirable side-effects, such as running under the (ps) name of the calling utility script... and that I have things set-up to not run this way ;-(

mario

_______________________________________________
Quixote-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.mems-exchange.org/mailman/listinfo/quixote-users

Reply via email to