It just occurred to me that I could use SCGIHandler / SCGIServer in a
LocationMatch directive to allow Apache to continue to serve some top-
level directories (my app mounts at /), which I couldn't do with
SCGIMount, because you can only use it in a server context.
I'm quite pleased that I've been able to avoid a needless (it seemed
to me) use of StaticDirectory, but I'm a little worried that avoiding
SCGIMount is a Bad Thing.
Is it? Will I be caught out by a future version of mod_scgi, or is
the SCGIServer / SCGIHandler combo going to remain for those of us
who wish to exploit apache?
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matt Patterson | Design & Code
<matt at emdash co uk> | http://www.emdash.co.uk/
<matt at reprocessed org> | http://www.reprocessed.org/
_______________________________________________
Quixote-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.mems-exchange.org/mailman/listinfo/quixote-users
