It's a good choice to go to Lighhtpd ;-). Look at my bench. http://www.quixote.ca/qx/LighttpdScgi I know, a bit old.
More over Lighttpd is much more simplier to configure and tune than Apache. But this is a personnal opinion. --- Arturo FM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > Actually, all my applications with Quixote runs with > Apache and mod_scgi. Now I'm thinking about > replacing > Apache for lighttpd. This web server has intregrated > support for scgi and doesn't need an additional > module. I read about great performance of sites > using > lighttpd. > I usually work with Debian GNU/Linux and FreeBSD in > my > servers. > Have anybody a great experience using lighttpd > instead Apache? > > ---------------------------- > Arturo Fernandez (artufm at yahoo dot es) > > > > ______________________________________________ > LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. > Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por > minuto. > http://es.voice.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > Quixote-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.mems-exchange.org/mailman/listinfo/quixote-users > ____________________________________________________________________________________ 8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news _______________________________________________ Quixote-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.mems-exchange.org/mailman/listinfo/quixote-users
